Your AI Conversations Are Not Privileged: What a New SDNY Ruling Means for Every Lawyer and Client
Articles / Research Papers
Must Read!
A federal judge has confirmed what many suspected, but few wanted to hear: conversations with AI tools are not protected by attorney-client privilege. On February 10, in United States v. Heppner, Judge Jed Rakoff of the Southern District of New York ruled that dozens of documents a criminal defendant generated using a non-enterprise consumer version of Anthropic's Claude are neither privileged nor protected as “work product.” The decision is the first of its kind, and its reasoning should affect how every attorney advises clients about AI...
See the bench ruling: https://www.mindingyourbusinesslitigation.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/53/2026/02/Bench_Ruling_on_AI_and_Privilege_1771361150.pdf
Author: Andrew R. Lee, Jason M. Loring, Graham H. Ryan, Jones Walker LLP
Visit ResourceRate This Resource
Click a star to rate (1-5, with 5 being the best)
Information Summary
Created
3/16/2026 11:36:00 AM
Last Edited
3/16/2026 11:44:00 AM
Tested
3/16/2026
Content Type
Articles / Research Papers
Category
Valuator AI Tips/Usage/Efficiencies
Usage Type
Free
Report Problems or Issues
Found something wrong with this page? Let us know.
Report Submitted Successfully
Thank you for your feedback. We'll look into it.
Submission Failed
There was an error submitting the form. Please try again.